But you probably don’t want one if you just want to profile displays.Īs a metaphor: if you want to take someone’s temperature, you generally want a thermometer, not a thermal imaging camera. If you want a spectrometer-style device, consider the ColorMunki Photo/Design or i1Photo Pro 2. They are both colorimeters (that work kinda like the human eye, detecting very specific frequencies of light and then determining the overall colour from that), not spectrometers (which detect varying frequencies within a range). Of course, how much money may vary, too – for some reason it seems significantly cheaper in the UK than the USA right now. If you plan on using Displa圜AL and other open-source software, and you’re not a professional calibrator for who time is money, I’d say save your money and go with the ColorMunki Display – but I guess it depends on how much you value your time as well (considering you may be able to do other things while it’s churning away anyway). Personally I found the CPU side of profile and look-up table creation takes the longest, even manually taking 175 readings. Florian estimates that the ColorMunki is roughly 70% of the speed – that is, the i1 Display Pro is ~40-45% faster at taking readings. The slowest readings are for the lowest light levels those may take the same time on both. The firmware limit on sensor readings only applies if the sensor can actually take a reading in that time. The lifespan should be equivalent – unless silvery exterior branding panels slower or faster than black ones – although the warranty may differ (perhaps depending on where you buy it).Īs for speed – “up to 5x faster” may be deceptive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |